The “Strong Economy” Myth
When Spain’s M3 money supply grew ~25% in three years while real GDP grew only ~8% (2022: 5.4%, 2023: 2.5%, 2024: ~2.9%), the so-called “growth” was largely an accounting trick:
Nominal GDP Growth = Real Growth+Inflation
Not productivity. Not innovation. Just monetary debasement.
The euro-only path 2022-2024 left the average Spanish household with 12 % less food, whereas converting the same €1 600 into Bitcoin would have given roughly €6 000–€7 000 extra food-budget value by the end of 2024. Got your attention?
The Money Supply Surge
| Year | M3 Growth Pattern |
|---|---|
| 2022 | High growth following pandemic stimulus, elevated inflation |
| 2023 | Growth continued but moderated as ECB began tightening |
| 2024 | Further moderation as interest rates remained elevated |
Context: Spain’s M3 averaged around €1.05 trillion from 1997–2026. The current level (€1.77 trillion) is 68% above historical averages. This reflects Eurozone quantitative easing (2020–2022) masquerading as “recovery.”
Prosperity is an Illusion
The 30.7% cumulative food price increase (December 2019–August 2024) aligns remarkably well with the ~25% M3 expansion plus the initial 2020 monetary surge.
Why “Supply Shocks” Don’t Fully Explain It
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| War in Ukraine | Fertilizer/energy costs spiked, but farmer input costs rose 55% while food prices rose 30.7%—the pass-through was partial and lagged |
| Supply chain disruptions | Largely resolved by 2023, yet prices remained elevated |
| Corporate greed | No evidence of sustained margin expansion; producers were squeezed too |
The persistent elevation in prices—especially essentials like olive oil (+32% in 2024 alone)—suggests monetary debasement rather than temporary supply constraints.
The Timeline Tells the Truth
Whether farmers absorbed losses or not, the key insight remains: inflation wasn’t purely “cost-push.”
| Metric | Peak | Final (Aug 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Farmer input costs | +55% (Aug 2022) | -21% from peak, still +22% vs 2019 |
| Food prices | Rising | +30.7% vs 2019 |
Result: Input costs spiked then fell back 21%. Food prices kept climbing to +30.7%. This suggests monetary factors (M3 expansion) sustained price levels even after supply shocks moderated.
The Mechanism
When M3 expands 22–25% in three years but real economic output grows only ~8–10%, you have more money chasing relatively fewer goods:
Inflation = Money Supply Growth−Real GDP Growth
Spain’s ~15% “excess” money growth aligns roughly with the sustained price level shift.
The Cover Narrative
Governments and central banks prefer supply-side explanations because they:
- Shift blame externally (Putin, climate, “greed”)
- Avoid acknowledging that inflation is the chosen policy—the cost of financing pandemic spending and energy subsidies through monetary expansion
The ECB raised rates eventually (2022–2023), but only after the monetary damage was baked into the price level. The money supply was already circulating.
Bottom line: The correlation isn’t just damning—it’s predictive. When M3 grows faster than productive capacity, the tax on purchasing power follows.
What Actually Happened to Households
| Metric | Reality |
|---|---|
| Nominal spending | Up significantly (more euros circulating) |
| Real output | Modest gains |
| Purchasing power | Down (prices rose faster than wages) |
| Household food budgets | Up 19.5% in nominal terms, down 3.7% real |
The “strong economy” headlines measure nominal activity—more transactions because more money exists. Not more value created.
The Circular Logic
Governments claim: “Economy growing! Unemployment low!”
But dig deeper:
- Jobs grew in nominal terms (more euros paid)
- Real wages stagnated or fell for many sectors
- People feel “richer” in euro terms but buy less
The 26% of household expenditure now going to food (up from 23.4% in 2019) tells the real story: more money chasing the same calories.
The Inescapable Equation
More Money + Flat Productivity = Higher Prices
Not:
More Money = More Wealth
Spain’s “economic miracle” is largely inflationary nominal growth—the ECB printing euros that flowed into asset prices, housing, and consumer spending, creating the appearance of prosperity while eroding the purchasing power of each euro. Whilst there are energy shocks and Putin issues, it’s the political framing that emphasizes the temporary supply shock while downplaying the lasting effect of the extra euros that remain in circulation.
The damning evidence: Food prices up 30.7% while real household food consumption fell 3.7%.
That’s not prosperity. That’s monetary extraction.
The State Extraction Machine
When real productivity grows at ~2-3% but the state collects:
| Mechanism | Growth Rate |
|---|---|
| Tax revenue | +6.4% to +10.4% annually |
| M3/money supply | +25% over 3 years |
| Fines/sanctions | Record levels (6.1 million penalties) |
…the state is growing faster than the economy that supposedly supports it.
How It Works
The state doesn’t produce wealth—it extracts it:
- Taxes → Direct confiscation of productive output
- Inflation → Silent wealth transfer via monetary debasement
- Fines → Penalization of behavior for revenue
- Debt → Future extraction committed today
The Perversion
| What They Claim | What Happens |
|---|---|
| “Public services” | Bureaucracy expands while service quality stagnates |
| “Social welfare” | Dependency increases, self-sufficiency decreases |
| “Economic growth” | Nominal metrics rise, real purchasing power falls |
| “Record employment” | More people working to pay more taxes for less value |
The Result
Household food spending:
- Nominal: +19.5%
- Real: -3.7%
People work more hours, pay more taxes, face more fines, hold more nominal euros—and yet eat less, save less, own less.
The “strong Spanish economy” is strong for the state, not for Spaniards. The state grows through extraction while the productive economy—the actual creation of value—stagnates.
This is the stationary bandit model: monopolize violence, extract surplus, grow the apparatus. The only difference from historical feudalism is the sophistication of the extraction (inflation, debt, regulatory fines) versus direct tribute.
States and fiat financial systems grow until constrained by collapse or revolution.
Why Bitcoin?
Many observers argue that the “inflation story” in Spain is largely a monetary-supply phenomenon – the euro-denominated money supply expanded, but the real-economy (food, wages, output) barely kept pace. Bitcoin, being a global, non-sovereign asset, captured the broader surge in global money creation and risk-appetite, turning a modest €1 600 food budget into a multi-thousand-euro “investment” in just two years.
Put another way: the euro-only path leaves you with 12 % less food, whereas converting the same €1 600 into Bitcoin would have given you roughly €6 000–€7 000 extra food-budget value by the end of 2024.
That’s the story Bitcoin has been screaming since 2009. Please listen 🙂
Leave a Reply